As an
entrepreneur owning a brand or set of brands... quite a few times in your life
you may come across a situation when you may start thinking, “Is my brand going
in right direction? Are we loosing focus? Do i need to makeover the brand or
create a new brand and let the old one die?
Its
confusing situation and quite often difficult to find an easy answer to these
questions. There is always a fear of going wrong in decision and damaging the
existing business.
A Brand has
a life...quite like us but you as a brand owner governs that life
Brands are
born, stay young then mature and eventually they die, sometimes due to wrong
decisions but mostly due to fast changing market conditions, emergence of new
brands and change in corporate positioning where a particular brand may be a
misfit.
For Example,
Binaca, an oral care brand whose
popularity in the 1970s and 1980s was next to that of only Colgate, and which
was also a prefix to a much-loved All India Radio programme, Binaca Geetmala.
It has faded to near oblivion in the subsequent two decades. Dabur bought it
from Reckitt Benckiser in 1996 -- with the intention of reviving it to ride
onto the white toothpowder segment but Dabur failed in that product
diversification because the category was stagnant and margins were thin, and it
almost withdrew and also tried to sell it off but found no takers. Similar case
happened with once very popular Indian soft drink brand “Gold Spot” which is now dead.
It is
important to keep a check on the ailing brands in the company’s portfolio which
are slowly getting irrelevant or obsolete due to changing market scenario. If a
company can proactively manage this it can minimise the damages caused due to
overstretching a brand’s life cycle.
Is you brand strong and contributing to your
business even in changing scenario?
If your brand is very strong in
its category and has a glorious past with its positioning but is slowly losing
its sheen in the changing market scenario, it is very difficult to bring the
sheen back to the brand as people always identify the brand with its earlier
strong identity. Changing people’s perception about the brand is an extremely
difficult if not impossible task for a company. We have seen brands with cult
status in their category going in oblivion.
Let us take
a case of Kodak once a brand leader in the photography products now not able to
sustain the challenging emergence of digital photography era which has swept
away its huge chunk of market share. The reason is its strong image of a brand
of traditional photography and film products. Even after adopting new digital
technology...it is seen as a struggling brand now.
Remaking a
brand with new emerging technology or product innovation may sometimes be
helpful if you brand is the first mover in the product category but if you are
a follower you carry a baggage of your earlier image which may not be exciting
for the new age consumer hence you are not preferred if consumer is having
option of going to the new. In case of
Kodak...had they been the first and only brand to launch a product with digital
technology... they could have probably retained their market leader position but
other brands like Nikon, FUJI etc. got more aggressive in market and acquired
the space of digital cameras leaving Kodak far behind.
Same goes
with Indian brand Like BPL...one of the largest consumer electronics players in
1990’s They lost their way completely in
early 2000 after Korean giants like LG and Samsung came to India and turnaround
the market with innovative products coupled with high-decibel marketing
campaigns & extensive after sales service centre networks across the
country. They are trying hard to revive but with current competition it looks
tough for them to turn it around. If BPL
has to come back now merely following the footstep of LG and Samsung will
surely not work...they have to come back completely repackaged and might have
to change their brand identity and logo also and has to look more relevant to
the new market.
Does
repackaging help in reviving a brand?
For product
brands it is still easy to alter or improve the brand identity by repackaging
and repositioning the brand. If we take a case of Lifebuoy A carbolic soap used
in office toilets, dhabas and other cost-conscious points, Lifebuoy has
transformed itself from a toilet soap a leading family bath soap with its
repositioning as a soap for health conscious people .
When it
comes to services brand or a company’s brand identity, it is far more
challenging and time consuming as options of exiting is not the option here.
There are 4 options
Option-1-
Repackaging the brand by changing the colour identity, brand logo etc.
Option-2- Diversify
into different categories of business
Option-3- New
Product innovation which can add value to the brand and edge over other
Close competition.
Option-4-
Launch a new marketing campaign with new logo and new offerings under the
Company portfolio and
aggressively communicate with the target market
We have seen
Godrej India doing this successfully few years back which completely
changed their identity of an old age brand to a new age happening brand. Godrej
had shed the bright red in its logo and given it a fresh blue-green-red look.
The change in the logo colour symbolises Godrej’s new corporate identity and
the refurbishment of its corporate brand. With the change in logo Godrej also
diversified itself to personal grooming, aerospace, property and lifestyle
category.
What should
you do?
As a brand
owner it is important to understand that if your brand has to stay relevant to
its target market and live a longer life. It must follow the DRIC Principle.
-Diversify (D)
-Repackage (R)
-Innovate (I)
-Communicate(C)
Follow
the DRIC principle and save your brand.
0 comments:
Post a Comment